Um recente artigo publicado no J Epidemiol Community Health (doi:10.1136/jech.2009.088690) investigou a associação entre país de origem e freqüência de citação de 4724 artigos publicados entre 1998 e 2002 nos British Medical Journal, The Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association e New England Journal of Medicine. O trabalho demonstrou que artigos provenientes de países pobres possuem chance maior de serem pobremente citados, quando comparados a artigos de países ricos (OR = 1.93; 95% IC 1.28-2.89). Este fato teoricamente leva os editores a darem preferência a artigos do primeiro mundo, pois estes contribuem melhor para o nível de impacto das revistas. Se por um lado isto torna nossa vida mais difícil, por outro lado, podemos considerar que nosso mérito de publicar em revistas internacionais é maior do que o mérito de nossos colegas do primeiro mundo.
Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: do they reflect inequalities in access to publication?
Background: The acceptance of a paper in a top-ranked journal depends on the importance of the study, and should not depend on its country of origin. If the papers’ citation rate is a proxy for their importance, and the threshold for acceptance is unrelated to the country of origin, papers from different countries published in the same journal should have a similar number of citations. Conversely, if the threshold is lowered for some countries, their papers will have a lower mean citation rate.
Methods: We obtained the number of citations and the corresponding author’s country for 4724 papers published between 1998 and 2002 in the British Medical Journal, the Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association, New England Medical Journal. Countries were grouped according to the World Bank classification and geographic location: low-middle income countries, European high-income countries, non-European high-income countries, UK and USA. We estimated the probability of papers of being poorly cited by country of origin, using domestic papers (British papers published in British journals and US papers published in US journals) as the reference.
Results: Compared with domestic papers, the odds ratio of being poorly cited was 0.67 (95% confidence intervals: 0.55-0.81) for papers from high-income European countries, 0.97 (0.76-1.24) for papers from non-European high-income countries and 1.93 (1.28-2.89) for papers from low-middle income countries.
Conclusions: Papers from different countries published in the same journal have different citation rates. This may reflect difficulties for researchers from some countries to publish their research in leading medical journals.